← Back
Fetching drawings from USPTO…
A herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health and processes for manufacturing the same from ingredients are disclosed comprising: a herbal concentrate having a first predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a herbal powder mixture having a second predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a mushroom extract ingredient having a third predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a collagen extract ingredient having a fourth percentage (%) by weight, a solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol having a fifth percentage (%) by weight, and a plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having a sixth percentage (%) by weight.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY
This application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 19/275,921, entitled “Plant-based extract complex composition having the properties for supporting the relief of musculoskeletal pain, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory and process of manufacturing the same”, filed on 21 Jul. 2025. The patent application identified above is incorporated here by reference in its entirety to provide continuity of disclosure.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of herbal pharmaceutical formulations for musculoskeletal health. More specifically, it relates to a multi-component oral composition combining standardized herbal and mushroom extracts, marine collagen, betel leaf-derived 4-allylpyrocatechol, and plant-derived nanovesicles to alleviate inflammation and support joint function. The invention further encompasses the method and integrated manufacturing process steps for preparing this bioactive composition.
BACKGROUND ART
The musculoskeletal system is frequently compromised by chronic inflammatory and degenerative conditions, such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and age-related cartilage deterioration, that result in pain, reduced mobility, and diminished quality of life. Conventional treatments predominantly involve nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and synthetic analgesics to manage symptoms; however, prolonged NSAID use is associated with gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular side effects, and these interventions often fail to halt or reverse tissue degeneration. In recent years, there has been growing interest in nutraceutical and herbal approaches that offer anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective benefits without the adverse side-effect profiles of synthetic drugs.
A variety of single-entity herbal extracts have been investigated for joint health, including Angelica pubescens, Cinnamomum cassia, Asarum heterotropoides, and Ligusticum wallichii, each demonstrating variable degrees of anti-inflammatory, analgesic, or antioxidative activity. Yet standardized bioactive compound concentrations are difficult to maintain across batches, leading to inconsistent clinical outcomes. Similarly, mushroom-derived β-glucan preparations (e.g., from Auricularia auricula, Tremella fuciformis, Lentinus edodes, Hericium erinaceus) have been shown to modulate immune responses and support cartilage health, but these extracts often suffer from low oral bioavailability due to high molecular weight and poor solubility. Marine collagen, particularly low-molecular-weight fractions obtained from fish byproducts, has demonstrated promise in promoting cartilage matrix synthesis and reducing joint stiffness, but its rapid enzymatic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract limits systemic delivery to the joint microenvironment.
4-Allylpyrocatechol (APC), a phenolic compound isolated from Piper betle (betel leaf), exhibits potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in preclinical studies; however, APC's clinical translation is hindered by its poor stability in the gastric milieu and rapid first-pass metabolism, leading to subtherapeutic levels at the site of inflammation. While liposomal and synthetic polymer-based nanoparticle carriers have been explored for phytochemical delivery, these systems often involve synthetic excipients that may trigger immunogenicity or accumulate in vivo. In contrast, plant-derived nanovesicles (PDNVs) have recently emerged as a biocompatible platform capable of protecting sensitive phytochemicals, enhancing mucosal uptake, and enabling targeted delivery without adverse immunological consequences.
Existing formulations in the marketplace rarely integrate multiple bioactive modalities, such as standardized herbal concentrates, mushroom extracts, marine collagen, purified APC, and PDNVs, into a single, cohesive, and scalable manufacturing process. Those that do often lack synergistic optimization, leading to suboptimal efficacy. Moreover, no current oral composition has successfully demonstrated simultaneous protection of APC through PDNV encapsulation, stabilization of marine collagen, and co-release of polysaccharide, phenolic, and proteinaceous actives in a consistent, reproducible manner. As a result, there exists a clear need for a multi-component oral pharmaceutical herbal composition engineered to overcome bioavailability challenges, synchronize release profiles, and harness synergistic interactions among phytochemicals, β-glucans, collagen peptides, and nanovesicular carriers to maximize anti-inflammatory and regenerative effects for musculoskeletal health.
The invention aims to solve these technical problems of the prior art by providing a herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health comprising: a herbal concentrate having a first predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a herbal powder mixture having a second predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a mushroom extract ingredient having a third predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a collagen extract ingredient having a fourth percentage (%) by weight, a solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol having a fifth percentage (%) by weight, and a plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having a sixth percentage (%) by weight.
In particular, the objective of the present invention is to provide a method of manufacturing a herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health comprising: (i) preparing materials including: a herbal concentrate, a herbal powder mixture, a mushroom extract ingredient, a collagen extract ingredient, a solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol, and a plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient; (ii) mixing the solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol with the plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient to obtain a solution 10; (iii) mixing the herbal concentrate with the herbal powder mixture, the mushroom extract ingredient, the collagen extract ingredient, and the solution 10 to obtain a foundation mixture; (iv) creating a base solution; (v) mixing the base solution with an excipient ingredient to obtain the herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health; and (vi) shaping and packaging.
Finally, what is needed is a manufacturing process featuring simplified operational steps, optimized technical specifications, and the potential for seamless scale-up to industrial production.
This invention provides solutions to achieve the above goals by integrating compatible extraction, concentration, and mixing protocols into a unified, reproducible workflow.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This present invention provides, in one aspect, a herbal oral composition for the alleviation of the symptoms associated with arthritis or herbal oral composition for the prophylactic amelioration of arthritis. The present composition also provides methods of extracting useful compounds from herbs for use in these oral composition.
Accordingly, an objective of the present invention is to provide a method of manufacturing a herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health, comprising the following steps (i) to (vi):
(i) preparing materials including: a herbal concentrate having a first predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a herbal powder mixture having a second predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a mushroom extract ingredient having a third predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a collagen extract ingredient having a fourth percentage (%) by weight, a solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol having a fifth percentage (%) by weight, and a plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having a sixth percentage (%) by weight;
(ii) mixing the solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol with the plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient at temperatures of 30° C.-50° C., with stirring at an average speed of 400 rpm for 15 minutes to obtain a solution 10;
(iii) mixing the herbal concentrate with the herbal powder mixture, the mushroom extract ingredient, the collagen extract ingredient, and the solution 10 at temperatures of 30° C.-50° C., with stirring at an average speed of 400 rpm for 15-45 minutes to obtain a foundation mixture;
(iv) creating a base solution, wherein 100 mL of the base solution created by mixing performed in a specific order from (h1) to (h3) comprising:
(h1) adding 125 mg of the foundation mixture with 100 mg of glycyrrhizic acid, 50 mg of a phospholipid component, and 315 mg of lipoid S100 into a reaction tank, adding 0.2 part of absolute ethanol, refluxing at 60° C. for 2 hours to obtain a solution 20;
(h2) dissolving 250 mg of chitosan with 10 mL of distilled water, slowly adding 0.5 mL of glacial acetic acid, combined with stirring 50 rpm, adding 30 ml of water and let stand until the solution is clear, transferring the cleared solution into a 50 mL volumetric flask, and adding distilled water to the mark to obtain 50 mL of a chitosan solution with concentration of 5 mg/mL; and
(h3) dissolving 1 mL of the chitosan solution at step (h2) with 300 mg of a poloxamer component and 85 mL of distilled water, cooling the reaction mixture and stirring at 600 rpm until the reaction mixture is homogeneous, injecting 8 mL of the solution 10 at a rate of 1 mL/min with a stirring speed of 1000 rpm for 30 minutes, and adding distilled water to make 100 mL of the base solution;
(v) mixing the base solution with an excipient ingredient in a ratio of 1:(12-30) w/w, and evaporating the centrifuged mixture at 45° C.-50° C., pressure of 100-150 mbar until the humidity reaches 10%-20% to obtain the herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health; wherein the excipient ingredient is prepared by mixing corn starch, lactose, talc, nipagin, propylparaben and magnesium stearate in the ratio of 3.5:1.5:2.5:1:1:1.5 by mass; and
(vi) shaping and packaging.
Another objective of the present invention is to provide a herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health including: a herbal concentrate having 25% to 60% by weight, a herbal powder mixture having 20% to 60% by weight, a mushroom extract ingredient having 0.5% to 18% by weight, a collagen extract ingredient having 0.1% to 20% by weight, a solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol having 0.01% to 0.45% by weight, and a plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having 0.02% to 0.2% by weight; wherein the composition is produced by the method of manufacturing comprising steps (i) to (iv) described in detail above.
Another objective of the present invention is to provide a herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health including: a herbal concentrate having 30% to 60% by weight, a herbal powder mixture having 30% to 60% by weight, a mushroom extract ingredient having 1.5% to 18% by weight, a collagen extract ingredient having 2.5% to 20% by weight, a solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol having 0.01% to 0.45% by weight, and a plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having 0.02% to 0.2% by weight; wherein the composition is produced by the method of manufacturing comprising steps (i) to (iv) described in detail above.
These and other advantages of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after having read the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, which are illustrated in the various drawing Figures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method of manufacturing a herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
It should be noted that the terms “comprises” and “comprising”, as well as “the” and “these”, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, system, product, or device that comprises a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those explicitly listed and may include other steps or units not explicitly mentioned or inherent to such processes, methods, products, or devices.
In the embodiment of the present invention, percent mass or percentage (%) by weight=(mass of solute/mass of solution)×100%. The unit of mass is usually grams, or kilograms. Mass percent is also known as the correct percentage by weight or w/w %. It should also be noted that the molar mass is also within the meaning of the invention. Molar mass is the total mass of all atoms in a mole of compound. Total all volume percentages add up to 100%.
It should also be noted that the term “mixing homogenizing” is used in the invention understood to mean the uniform distribution, or complete dissolution of, substances present in a solution/mixture.
It should be noted that the terms “admixed/mixed/admixing/mixing” as used in the present invention is understood to mean adding, or reacting, or dissolving homogeneously, or evenly, components in the same solution/mixture.
As the plant extracted or herbal extracted or medicine herbal extracted in the present invention, an “extracts” extracted as an active compound contained in any of the plants mentioned. The plant extract in an active compounds sense obtained by steam distillation from the above plants or dried materials thereof is preferably used as the “extracts” in the present invention, but is not limited thereto. For example, active compounds extracted from the plants by using other methods such as extraction or expression are also included in the “extracts” of the present invention as long as they contain extracted components (such as active compounds). Other methods for extracting active compounds from plants, for example, solvent extraction (such as alcohol extraction, organic solvent extraction), oil and fat adsorption extraction (hot effleurage or cold effleurage), and supercritical fluid extraction are known. Examples of the solvent used for extraction include, but are not limited to, alcohols such as ethanol, methanol, propanol, isopropanol, and butanol, and organic solvents including relatively high polarity solvents such as acetone and low polarity solvents such as hexane. The “extracts” in the present invention may be those in which the active compounds obtained by the above method is further purified and concentrated by using various purification procedures such as hydrophobic or adsorptive chromatography using a support such as porous beads, silica gel, or alumina.
One embodiment of the invention is now described with reference to FIG. 1. FIG. 1 illustrates a flowchart illustrating a method of manufacturing a herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health 100 (“method 100”) based on the above principle in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. In particular, method 100 includes the following steps:
At step 101, preparing materials includes the ingredients listed in Table 1 below, including: a herbal concentrate having a first predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a herbal powder mixture having a second predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a mushroom extract ingredient having a third predetermined percentage (%) by weight, a collagen extract ingredient having a fourth percentage (%) by weight, a solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol having a fifth percentage (%) by weight, and a plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having a sixth percentage (%) by weight.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, the herbal concentrate is prepared by performing steps (a1) to (a3), including:
(a1) collecting and pre-processing 19 types of medicine herbals to be extracted individually including removing damaged parts, washing, drying overnight and drying at 40° C.-50° C. until reaching 8%-15% moisture, chopping and stored in separate instruments;
wherein 19 types of medicine herbals from (A) to (U) listed in Table 2 below, including: Angelica pubescens uses the root parts, Cinnamomum cassia uses the branch parts, Asarum heterotropoides uses the root parts, Ligusticum wallichii uses the rhizome parts, Angelica sinensis uses the root parts, Saposhnikovia divaricata uses the root parts, Eucommia ulmoides uses the bark parts, Achyranthes bidentata uses the root parts, Wolfiporia extensa uses the fruiting body parts, Glycyrrhiza uralensis uses the root parts, Loranthus parasiticus uses the branch parts, Paeonia lactiflora uses the root parts, Rehmannia glutinosa uses the root parts, Justicia gendarussa uses the root parts, Tinospora sinensis uses the stem and leaves, Chrysanthemum indicum uses the flower, Vitex negundo use the leaves, Brassica alba uses the seed, and Justicia gendarussa uses the bark parts;
(a2) creating a medicine herbal mixture by mixing 19 types of medicine herbals prepared in step (a1) in the following percentage (%) by weight: 2.25 parts of Angelica pubescens, 1.5 parts of Cinnamomum cassia, 1.5 parts of Asarum heterotropoides, 1.5 parts of Ligusticum wallichii, 1.5 parts of Angelica sinensis, 2 parts of Saposhnikovia divaricata, 1.5 parts of Eucommia ulmoides, 2.25 parts of Achyranthes bidentata, 1.5 parts of Poria cocos, 1.5 parts of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, 1.5 parts of Loranthus parasiticus, 1.5 parts of Paeonia lactiflora, 1.5 parts of Rehmannia glutinosa, 1.5 parts of Justicia gendarussa, 1.2 parts of Tinospora sinensis, 1.2 parts of Chrysanthemum indicum, 0.5-1 parts of Vitex negundo, 0.5-1.5 parts Brassica alba, and 0.5-1 parts of Justicia gendarussa; and
(a3) creating the herbal concentrate by soaking the medicine herbal mixture by mixing the medicine herbal mixture with water in a ratio of 1:15-20 w/v, extracting at 65° C.-70° C. for 3-4 hours to obtain a mixture 1, centrifuging the mixture 1 at a speed of 3000-4000 rpm for 30-40 minutes to obtain a centrifuged solution 1 and a residue 1; soaking the residue 1 with water and enzyme cellulase in a ratio of 1000:5000: (1-2) w/v/w, incubating at 45° C.-50° C. for 2-3 hours to obtain a mixture 2, centrifuging the mixture 2 at a speed of 3000-4000 rpm for 30-40 minutes to obtain a centrifuged solution 2 and a residue 2; soaking the residue 2 with ethanol 60% in a ratio of 1:10 w/v, stirring 600-700 rpm and support ultrasonic waves at frequency 0.2-0.3 kHz to obtain a mixture 3, centrifuging the mixture 3 at a speed of 3000-4000 rpm for 30-40 minutes to obtain a centrifuged solution 3 and a residue 3; mixing the centrifuged solution with the centrifuged solution 2, and the centrifuged solution 3 to obtain a centrifuged mixture; and evaporating the centrifuged mixture at 45° C.-50° C., pressure of 100-150 mbar until the humidity reaches 25%-30% to obtain the herbal concentrate.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, the herbal powder mixture is prepared by performing steps (b1) to (b2), including:
(b1) collecting and pre-processing 17 types of medicine herbals to be used individually including removing damaged parts, washing, drying overnight and drying at 40° C.-50° C. until reaching 8%-15% moisture, chopping, grinding into powder and stored in separate instruments;
wherein 17 types of medicine herbal powders from (A)-(R) listed in Table 2 below, including: Angelica pubescens uses the root parts, Cinnamomum cassia uses the branch parts, Asarum heterotropoides uses the root parts, Ligusticum wallichii uses the rhizome parts, Angelica sinensis uses the root parts, Saposhnikovia divaricata uses the root parts, Eucommia ulmoides uses the bark parts, Achyranthes bidentata uses the root parts, Wolfiporia extensa uses the fruiting body parts, Glycyrrhiza uralensis uses the root parts, Loranthus parasiticus uses the branch parts, Paeonia lactiflora uses the root parts, Rehmannia glutinosa uses the root parts, Justicia gendarussa uses the root parts, Tinospora sinensis uses the stem and leaves, Brassica alba uses the seed, and Chrysanthemum indicum use the flower; and
(b2) creating the herbal powder mixture by admixing 17 types of medicine herbals prepared in step (b1) in the following percentage (%) by weight: 2.25 parts of Angelica pubescens, 1.5 parts of Cinnamomum cassia, 1.5 parts of Asarum heterotropoides, 1.5 parts of Ligusticum wallichii, 1.5 parts of Angelica sinensis, 2 parts of Saposhnikovia divaricata, 1.5 parts of Eucommia ulmoides, 2.25 parts of Achyranthes bidentata, 1.5 parts of Poria cocos, 1.5 parts of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, 1.5 parts of Loranthus parasiticus, 1.5 parts of Paeonia lactiflora, 1.5 parts of Rehmannia glutinosa, 1.5 parts of Justicia gendarussa, 1.2 parts of Tinospora sinensis, 0.5-1.5 parts Brassica alba, and 1.2 parts of Chrysanthemum indicum.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, the mushroom extract ingredient is prepared by performing steps (c1) to (c4), including:
(c1) collecting and pre-processing four types of mushrooms to be extracted individually including removing damaged parts, washing, drying at 40° C.-50° C. until reaching 8%-15% moisture, chopping, and stored in separate instruments; wherein four types of mushrooms include Auricularia auricula, Tremella fuciformis, Lentinus edodes, and Hericium erinaceus;
(c2) creating a mushroom mixture by admixing four types of mushrooms prepared in step (c1) in the following percentage (%) by weight: 1-2 parts Auricularia auricula, 1-2 parts Tremella fuciformis, 1-2 parts Lentinus edodes, and 1-2 parts Hericium erinaceus;
(c3) mixing the mushroom mixture with water, enzyme cellulase, and enzyme β-glucanase in a ratio of 1000:10000:1:1, then incubating at 45° C.-50° C. for 1 hours, and filtering to obtain a treated mushroom mixture; and
(c4) grinding the treated mushroom mixture, heating at 70° C. for 2 hours, cooling and freeze-drying to obtain a freeze-dried powder, soaking the freeze-dried powder with ethanol 70% in a ratio of 9:200 w/v, supported ultrasonic waves at a frequency of 0.2-0.3 kHz for 90 minutes to obtain a temporary mixture 1, centrifuging the temporary mixture 1 at a speed of 3000-4000 rpm for 30-40 minutes to obtain a temporary solution 1 and a temporary residue 1; soaking the temporary residue 1 with ethanol 70% in a ratio of 1:13 w/v, supported ultrasonic waves at a frequency of 0.2-0.3 kHz for 60 minutes to obtain a temporary mixture to obtain a temporary solution 2 and a temporary residue 2; soaking the temporary residue 2 with ethanol 70% in a ratio of 1:7 w/v, supported ultrasonic waves at a frequency of 0.2-0.3 kHz for 30 minutes to obtain a temporary mixture 3, centrifuging the temporary mixture 3 at a speed of 3000-4000 rpm for 30-40 minutes to obtain a temporary solution 3 and a temporary residue 3; mixing the temporary solution 1 with the temporary solution 2, and the temporary solution 3 to obtain a base mixture; incubating the base mixture for 3 hours, and evaporating at 45° C.-50° C. with pressure of 100-150 mbar until the humidity reaches 25%-30% to obtain the mushroom extract ingredient.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, the collagen extract ingredient is prepared by performing steps (d1) to (d5), including:
(d1) collecting by-products from herring in listed Table 3 below, including scales, skin and bones in a mass ratio of 1:4:3; wash, drying and grinding into a powder 1;
(d2) soaking the powder 1 with solution NaOH 0.09 M at 4° C. for 3 hours in a ratio of 1:7 w/v, centrifuging at a speed of 8000 rpm for 20 minutes to obtain a solid 1, and washing the solid 1 with water twice;
(d3) soaking the solid 1 at step (d1) with butyl alcohol solution 13% for 45 minutes in a ratio of 1:15 w/v, centrifuging at a speed of 8000 rpm for 20 minutes to obtain a solid 2, and washing the solid 2 with water twice;
(d4) soaking the solid 2 with H2O2 solution 5% in a ratio of 1:5 w/v for 10 minutes, centrifuging at a speed of 8000 rpm for 20 minutes to obtain a solid 3, and washing the solid 3 with water twice; and
(d5) soaking the solid 3 with a pineapple and papaya juice mixture in a ratio of 1:3 w/v for 1 hours, supported ultrasonic waves at a frequency of 0.2-0.3 kHz for 60 minutes, adding pepsin solution 0.45% mixed in 0.6 M acetic acid at 2.5° C.-3° C. for 24 hours according to 1 part of the solid 3:8 parts of pepsin solution w/v, centrifuging at a speed of 8000 rpm at 4° C. for 20 minutes to obtain a supernatant, adjusting pH to 6.8-7.2 with tris base 0.5 M, then precipitate with 2.5 M NaCl solution, and centrifuging at 8000 rpm at 4° C. for 20 min to form precipitate; dissolving the precipitate in 0.5 M acetic acid, dialyzing in 0.1 M acetic acid and distilling water for 48-72 hours, and freeze-drying to obtain the collagen extract ingredient.
According to the priority embodiment of the invention, the by-products from herring is selected from the one or more in the genus Sardinella of the including Sardinella aurita, Sardinella jussieu, Sardinella albella, Sardinella atricauda, Sardinella brachysoma, Sardinella fijiense, Sardinella fimbriata, Sardinella hualiensis, Sardinella marquesensis, and Sardinella melanura.
According to the priority embodiment of the invention, the pineapple and papaya juice mixture is prepared by mixing a pineapple juice with a papaya juice in a ratio of (1-5):(1-5) v/v, preferably the ratio of 1:1, 2:1 and 3:1.
It should be noted that the pineapple juice is primarily obtained through a mechanical pressing process where the pulp of ripe pineapples is crushed to extract the juice. This process involves cleaning the pineapples, peeling and extracting the pulp, and then pressing the pulp to separate the liquid. Similar to pineapple juice, papaya juice is obtained through several methods, such as blend papaya chunks with water or juice in a blender, or use a juicer to extract the juice.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, the solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol is prepared by performing steps (e1) to (e3), including:
(e1) grinding betel leaves with water in a ratio of 1:5 w/v, treating the ground betel leaves by ultrasonically at a frequency of 0.1 kHz for 2 hours, and steam distilled for 2.5 hours to obtain an extract solution 1 and a remaining solution after distillation;
(e2) mixing the remaining solution after distillation with diethyl ester solution in a ratio of 1:(1-5) v/v, evaporating the centrifuged mixture at 45° C.-50° C., pressure of 100-150 mbar until the humidity reaches 25%-30% to obtain a concentrate; purifying the concentrate through silica gel column chromatography with a hexane-ethyl acetate solvent in a ratio of 9:1, then purifying again one more on a C18 column with MeOH:H2O fraction in a ratio of 1:1 to obtain a white solid which is 4-allylpyrocatechol compound; and
(e3) dissolving the extract solution 1 at step (e1) with the white solid obtained in step (e2) at temperatures of 30° C.-42° C., with stirring at an average speed of 400 rpm for 15 minutes to obtain the solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, the plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient is prepared by mixing a first nanovesicles ingredient with a second nanovesicles ingredient in a ratio of 2:3 w/w.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, the first nanovesicles ingredient is prepared by performing steps (f1) to (f8):
(f1) collecting a plant mixture consisting of 2 parts of Illicium verum Hook. f., 3 parts of Artemisia vulgaris, and 3 parts of Piper sarmentosum;
(f2) washing three times with deionized water at 20° C.-25° C.;
(f3) pureeing the washed plant mixture with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) in a ratio of 1:3 w/v at a speed of 7000-8000 rpm for 15 minutes to obtain a first temporary solution;
(f4) filtering the first temporary solution by a filter membrane with a diameter 0.20-0.22 μm to obtain a second temporary solution;
(f5) centrifuging the second temporary solution by ultracentrifugation at 120000×g for 100 min at 4° C. to obtain a temporary solid;
(f6) dissolving the temporary solid in phosphate buffer solution (PBS), transferring to a 45% sucrose gradient solution, and ultracentrifugation at 130000×g for 100 min to obtain a third temporary solution;
(f7) washing the third temporary solution with PBS and centrifuging at 150000×g for 60 min at 4° C. to obtain a fourth temporary solution; and (f8) filtering the fourth temporary solution through a filter membrane with a diameter 0.20-0.22 μm to obtain the first nanovesicles ingredient.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, the second nanovesicles ingredient is prepared by performing steps (g1) to (g9):
(g1) collecting a fruit mixture including 3 parts of dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus, Hylocereus costaricensis, Hylocereus megalanthus, Hylocereus undatus costaricensis), 3 parts of avocado (Persea americana), and 1 part of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus);
(g2) washing the fruit mixture three times with deionized water at 20° C.-25° C.;
(g3) pureeing the washed fruit mixture with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) in a ratio of 1:1 (g/mL) at a speed of 7000-8000 rpm for 15 minutes to obtain a first foundation solution;
(g4) filtering the first foundation solution by a filter membrane with a diameter 0.20-0.22 μm to obtain a second foundation solution;
(g5) centrifuging the second foundation solution by ultracentrifugation at 100000×g for 60 min to obtain a residue;
(g6) dissolving the residue in phosphate buffer solution (PBS), transferring to a 45% sucrose gradient solution, and ultracentrifugation at 130000×g for 100 min to obtain a third foundation solution;
(g7) stirring the third foundation solution with a 10% polyethylene glycol-8000 (PEG8000) solution in a ratio of 1:1 v/v, and incubating for 8-10 hours at 4° C., then centrifuging at 110000×g for 40 minutes at 4° C. to obtain a precipitate;
(g8) dissolving the precipitate in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) in a ratio of 1:2 w/v to obtain a foundation solution; and
(g9) filtering the foundation solution by a tangential flow filtration (TFF) to obtain the second nanovesicles ingredient; wherein the technical specifications related to TFF include a molecular size of 500 kDa, and filtering at a flow rate of 20 mL/min with the transmembrane pressure maintained at 2 bar.
At step 102, mixing homogenizing the solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol with the plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient prepared in step 101 at temperatures of 30° C.-50° C., with stirring at an average speed of 400 rpm for 15 minutes to obtain a solution 10.
At step 103, mixing homogenizing the herbal concentrate with the herbal powder mixture, the mushroom extract ingredient, the collagen extract ingredient, and the solution 10 at temperatures of 30° C.-50° C., with stirring at an average speed of 400 rpm for 15-45 minutes to obtain a foundation mixture.
Within the scope of the present invention, the term “foundation mixture” includes the following meanings:
(a) A foundation mixture is a solution/or mixture that completely dissolves/mixing homogenizing the herbal concentrate, the herbal powder mixture, the mushroom extract ingredient, the collagen extract ingredient, the solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol, and the plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having the correct a predetermined ratio;
(b) A homogeneous mixture is act as a reactant, allowing the addition of ingredients to contribute their chemical and physical properties to create a new preparation; and
(c) A homogeneous mixture chemically bonds with other complementary ingredients including but not limited such as ionization reactions, covalent reactions, reducing reactions, replacement reactions, and rearrangement reactions to form a new chemical composition.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, at step 103, said first predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 25% to 60%, said second predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 20% to 60%, said third predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 0.5% to 18%, said fourth predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 0.1% to 20%, said fifth predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 0.01% to 0.45%, and said sixth predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 0.02% to 0.2% of the total weight of said foundation mixture.
According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, at step 103, said first predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 30% to 60%, said second predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 30% to 60%, said third predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 1.5% to 18%, said fourth predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 2.5% to 20%, and said fifth predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 0.01% to 0.45%, and said sixth predetermined percentage (%) by weight is between 0.02% to 0.2% of the total weight of said foundation mixture.
At step 104, creating a base solution, wherein 100 ml of the base solution created by mixing performed in a specific order from (h1) to (h3) comprising:
(h1) adding 125 mg of the foundation mixture with 100 mg of glycyrrhizic acid, 50 mg of a phospholipid component, and 315 mg of lipoid S100 into a reaction tank, adding 0.2 part of absolute ethanol, refluxing at 60° C. for 2 hours to obtain a solution 20;
(h2) dissolving 250 mg of chitosan with 10 mL of distilled water, slowly adding 0.5 mL of glacial acetic acid, combined with stirring 50 rpm, adding 30 mL of water and let stand until the solution is clear, transferring the cleared solution into a 50 mL volumetric flask, and adding distilled water to the mark to obtain 50 mL of a chitosan solution with concentration of 5 mg/mL; and
(h3) dissolving 1 mL of the chitosan solution at step (f2) with 300 mg of a poloxamer component and 85 mL of distilled water, cooling the reaction mixture and stirring at 600 rpm until the reaction mixture is homogeneous, injecting 8 mL of the solution 10 at a rate of 1 mL/min with a stirring speed of 1000 rpm for 30 minutes, and adding distilled water to make 100 mL of the base solution.
According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the poloxamer component is selected from the group consisting of poloxamer 124, poloxamer 188, poloxamer 237, poloxamer 338, and poloxamer 407.
According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the phospholipid component is selected from the group consisting of phosphatidylcholine (DMPC), phosphatidylserine (PS), and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE).
At step 105, mixing the base solution with an excipient ingredient in a ratio of 1:(12-30) w/w, and evaporating the centrifuged mixture at 45° C.-50° C., pressure of 100-150 mbar until the humidity reaches 10%-20% to obtain the herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health.
According to the invention, the excipient ingredient is prepared by mixing corn starch, lactose, talc, nipagin, propylparaben and magnesium stearate in the ratio of 3.5:1.5:2.5:1:1:1.5 by mass.
Finally, at step 106, shaping and packaging the herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health.
According to the embodiment of the present invention, a herbal oral composition having the properties for supporting and enhancing musculoskeletal health 200 (“composition 200”) including: a herbal concentrate having 25% to 60% by weight, a herbal powder mixture having 20% to 60% by weight, a mushroom extract ingredient having 0.5% to 18% by weight, a collagen extract ingredient having 0.1% to 20% by weight, a solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol having 0.01% to 0.45% by weight, and a plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having 0.02% to 0.2% by weight; wherein the composition 200 is produced by the process 100 comprising steps 101 to 106 described in detail above.
According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the composition 200 including: the herbal concentrate having 30% to 60% by weight, the herbal powder mixture having 30% to 60% by weight, the mushroom extract ingredient having 1.5% to 18% by weight, the collagen extract ingredient having 2.5% to 20% by weight, the solution containing 4-allylpyrocatechol having 0.01% to 0.45% by weight, and the plant-derived nanovesicles ingredient having 0.02% to 0.2% by weight.
According to other embodiments of the invention, the form of the composition 200 is produced by the process 100 of the present invention may be capsules, tablets, or hard gelatin capsules, depending on the dosage form thereof.
Besides capsules, the composition 200 may be provided as a tablet, aqueous or oil suspension, dispersible powder or granule, emulsion, hard or soft capsule, syrup, elixir, or beverage. The composition 200 intended for oral use may be prepared according to any method known in the art for the manufacture of pharmaceutically acceptable compositions and such compositions may contain one or more of the following agents: sweeteners, flavoring agents, coloring agents and preservatives. The sweetening and flavoring agents will increase the palatability of the preparation. Tablets containing extracts in admixture with non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable excipients suitable for tablet manufacture are acceptable. Pharmaceutically acceptable means that the agent should be acceptable in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of the formulation (as well as non-injurious to the patient). Such excipients include inert diluents such as calcium carbonate, sodium carbonate, lactose, calcium phosphate or sodium phosphate; granulating and disintegrating agents, such as corn starch or alginic acid; binding agents such as starch, gelatin or acacia; and lubricating agents such as magnesium stearate, stearic acid or talc. Tablets can be uncoated or can be coated by known techniques to delay disintegration and absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and thereby provide a sustained action over a longer period of time. For example, a time delay material such as glyceryl monostearate or glyceryl distearate alone or with a wax may be employed.
The composition 200 for oral use can also be presented as hard gelatin capsules wherein the active ingredient is mixed with an inert solid diluent, for example calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate or kaolin, or as soft gelatin capsules wherein the active ingredient is mixed with water or an oil medium, such as peanut oil, liquid paraffin or olive oil. In some embodiments, aqueous suspensions can contain an extract of the invention in admixture with excipients suitable for the manufacture of aqueous suspensions. Such excipients include, but are not limited to, suspending agents, dispersing or wetting agents, one or more preservatives, one or more coloring agents, one or more flavoring agents and one or more sweetening agents such as sucrose or saccharin. Oil suspensions may be formulated by suspending the active ingredient in a vegetable oil, such as arachis oil, olive oil, sesame oil or coconut oil, or in a mineral oil such as liquid paraffin. The oil suspension may contain a thickening agent, such as beeswax, hard paraffin or cetyl alcohol. Sweetening agents, such as those set forth above, and flavoring agents may be added to provide a palatable oral preparation. These formulations may be preserved by an added antioxidant such as ascorbic acid. Dispersible powders and granules of the invention suitable for preparation of an aqueous suspension by the addition of water provide one or more extracts in admixture with a dispersing or wetting agent, a suspending agent, and one or more preservatives. Additional excipients, for example sweetening, flavoring and coloring agents, may also be present.
It is important to understand that all weights referring to herbs in the above description are the dry weights of those herbs. While dried material is traditionally used and preferred, it must be recognized that drying of plant materials facilitates their storage, transportation and subsequent processing. Drying may not be a requirement to derive the benefits of these herbs. As such, the present invention may be practiced with the listed fresh plant materials as well. The use of fresh plant materials, sufficient to meet the requisite quantity and proportions of the extracts used, come under the scope of the present invention.
It is understood that several species within a plant genus may be given under a particular plant's entry in the Pharmacopoeia and these species with the same genus may be freely substituted by, or used in conjunction with, other members of the same genus as given in the Pharmacopoeia.
In addition, it is recognized that certain plant parts may contain the active components of interest in higher concentration and the present invention teaches the use of specific plant parts under the standardized nomenclature of the Pharmacopoeia. However, these components may also be present in the other parts of the same plants. As such, the components of interest may also be extracted from other parts of the same plant under the scope of the present claims. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that it is possible, with plant cell and tissue culture techniques, to culture the cells and tissue of these herbs in vitro and to extract the active components of interest from these cells and tissue.
The extraction process entailed reducing the size of the herbal materials. Here, the reducing in size may be achieved by a number of ways including, but not limited to, cutting, chopping, mincing, pounding, pulverizing, milling and grinding. While one way may be taught, other ways and means of achieving a reduction in size of the materials may also be used.
TABLE 1
Mixing ingredients of the composition 200 is produced
by the method 100 according to the invention
Optimal
Percentage
percentage
No.
Name of
(%)
(%)
1
The herbal concentrate
25-60
30-60
2
The herbal powder mixture
20-60
30-60
3
The mushroom extract ingredient
0.5-18
1.5-18
4
The collagen extract ingredient
0.1-20
2.5-20
5
The solution containing
0.01-0.45
0.01-0.45
4-allylpyrocatechol
6
The plant-derived nanovesicles
0.02-2
0.02-2
ingredient
TABLE 2
List of 19 types of medicine herbals in Vietnam according to the
invention
Scientific
name of the
Part
Active
Symbol
herb
used
ingredients
Uses
Distribution
(A)
Angelica
Tuberous
Coumarins,
Treats joint pain
Northern
pubescens
root
furanocoumarins,
due to
Vietnam
ferulic acid,
rheumatism,
essential oil(s)
rhinitis, runny
nose, toothache
(B)
Cinnamomum
Branchlet
Cinnamaldehyde,
Treats common
Vietnam
cassia
cinnamyl acetate,
cold, abdominal
eugenol, coumarin
pain, joint pain
(C)
Asarum
Root
Aristolochic acid,
Treats cough
Northern
heterotropoides
methyl eugenol,
and asthma,
Vietnam
safrole, asarone,
headache,
pinene
toothache,
rheumatic pain
(D)
Ligusticum
Rhizome
Ligustilide,
Promotes blood
Northern
wallichii
tetramethylpyrazine
circulation,
Vietnam
(TMP), ferulic acid,
relieves pain;
essential oil(s)
treats
headache,
menstrual pain,
pain due to
blood stasis,
rheumatism
(E)
Angelica
Root
Ligustilide, ferulic
Treats anemia,
Northern
sinensis
acid,
irregular
Vietnam
polysaccharides,
menstruation,
vitamin B12
menstrual pain
(F)
Saposhnikovia
Root
Chromones (prim-
Treats common
Northern
divaricata
O-
cold, headache,
Vietnam
glucosylcimifugin,
rheumatic joint
cimifugin),
pain, itchy skin
coumarins,
polysaccharides
(G)
Eucommia
Stem
Lignans
Strengthens
Northern
ulmoides
bark
(pinoresinol
tendons and
Vietnam
diglucoside),
bones, calms
iridoids
the fetus; treats
(geniposidic acid),
lower back and
aucubin, gutta-
knee pain, weak
percha,
tendons and
polysaccharides
bones, high
blood pressure,
threatened
miscarriage
(H)
Achyranthes
Tuberous
Triterpenoid
Treats back
Northern
bidentata
root
saponins
pain, joint pain,
Vietnam
(achyranthine),
irregular
ecdysterone,
menstruation,
polysaccharides,
difficult urination
potassium
(I)
Poria cocos
Sclerotium
Polysaccharides
Treats edema,
Ha
(pachyman),
scanty urination,
Giang,
triterpenes
diarrhea, poor
Thanh
(pachymic acid),
appetite due to
Hoa, Lam
ergosterol
spleen
Dong,
deficiency,
Gia Lai
palpitations,
(Vietnam)
insomnia
(K)
Glycyrrhiza
Root
Glycyrrhizin
Relieves pain,
Northern
uralensis
(glycyrrhizic acid),
treats cough,
Vietnam
liquiritin, glabridin,
abdominal pain,
flavonoids,
detoxifies
polysaccharides
(L)
Loranthus
Branchlet
Flavonoids
Treats lower
Northern
parasiticus
(quercetin, hyperin,
back and knee
and
avicularin),
pain, numbness/
Central
triterpenes, lectins
rheumatism,
Vietnam
threatened
miscarriage,
high blood
pressure
(M)
Paeonia
Tuberous
Paeoniflorin,
Treats blood
Northern
lactiflora
root
albiflorin, benzoic
deficiency,
Vietnam
acid, tannins,
irregular
monoterpenoid
menstruation,
glycosides
abdominal pain,
headache,
convulsions
(N)
Rehmannia
Tuberous
Iridoid glycosides
Treats high
Northern
glutinosa
root
(catalpol,
fever, bleeding,
Vietnam
rehmanniosides),
thirst; anemia,
stachyose,
lower back and
mannitol,
knee pain
polysaccharides
(O)
Justicia
Root
Alkaloids (justicin,
Treats aching
Northern
gendarussa
gendarusin A, B),
joints and bones,
Vietnam
flavonoids, lignans,
traumatic
triterpenes
hematoma
(bruising with
blood
stagnation),
menstrual pain
(P)
Tinospora
Stem
Alkaloids
Clears heat,
Vietnam
sinensis
(berberine,
detoxifies,
palmatine,
promotes
jatrorrhizine),
diuresis to
diterpenoid
remove
lactones
dampness, anti-
(tinosporide),
inflammatory;
polysaccharides,
Treats fever,
tinosporan
sore throat,
boils,
rheumatism,
dysentery
(Q)
Chrysanthemum
Flower
Flavonoids
Dispels wind-
Northern
indicum
(luteolin, apigenin,
heat, clears
Vietnam
acacetin), essential
heat, detoxifies,
oil(s) (borneol,
improves vision;
camphor,
treats wind-heat
chrysanthenone),
common cold,
chlorogenic acid
headache,
dizziness, red,
swollen and
painful eyes,
boils
(R)
Brassica alba
Seed
Myrosin, sinapine,
Anti-
Vietnam
sinalbin, sinigrin,
inflammatory,
fatty oils, saponins
reduces
swelling, treats
musculoskeletal
pain
(T)
Vitex negundo
Leaf
Flavonoids
Dispels wind,
Vietnam
(casticin, vitexin,
eliminates
isovitexin), iridoid
dampness,
glycosides
reduces
(agnuside,
inflammation,
aucubin), alkaloids,
relieves pain;
essential oil(s)
treats common
cold, headache,
bronchitis,
asthma,
rheumatic joint
pain, neuralgia
(U)
Justicia
Stem
Alkaloids (justicin,
Similar to root:
Northern
gendarussa
bark
gendarusin A, B),
Promotes blood
Vietnam
flavonoids, lignans,
circulation,
triterpenes
dispels wind,
eliminates
dampness,
relieves pain,
reduces swelling
TABLE 3
List of 10 herring species in Vietnam according to the invention
No.
Scientific name
Characteristics
Distribution
1
Sardinella aurita
Body is rounder, less scaly;
Coastal waters of Vietnam,
dark flesh, less fat, less bone
from Quang Nam to Nghe
An, and coastal waters of
Northern Vietnam
2
Sardinella jussieu
Body is slender, many whitish-
Coastal waters of Vietnam,
green shiny scales; flesh is
from Northern Vietnam to
white, fragrant, fatty, and firm,
central provinces like
but with many small bones
Thanh Hoa, Ha Tinh,
Quang Binh, and coastal
waters of Binh Thuan,
Saigon River basin, and Co
Chien River (Ben Tre)
3
Sardinella albella
Body is slender, easily loses
Coastal waters of Vietnam
scales
4
Sardinella atricauda
Body is elongated, slender;
Coastal waters of Vietnam
easily loses scales, body has
an iridescent silvery color
5
Sardinella
Body height is greater than
Coastal waters of Vietnam
brachysoma
body length
6
Sardinella fijiense
Body is elongated, somewhat
Coastal waters of Vietnam
cylindrical, slender, large
scales, easily loses scales,
blue-green iridescent back,
shiny silver belly
7
Sardinella fimbriata
Has serrated scales
Ba Ria-Vung Tau
8
Sardinella
Long body, slender, serrated
Coastal waters of Vietnam
hualiensis
abdominal fins, iridescent
blue-green back
9
Sardinella
Long body, slender, blue back,
Coastal waters of Vietnam
marquesensis
white belly, no dark spots
10
Sardinella melanura
Dark caudal fin
Van Phong Bay (Khanh Hoa)
EXAMPLES
The following experimental section is provided purely by way of illustration and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. In the following experimental section, reference is made to the appended drawings, wherein:
Example 1: Production of Composition 200 According to Method 100
Method 100 is applied to produce composition 200 from 100 kg of input raw materials, using three formulations: 1, 2, and 3, as illustrative examples. The components and the weight of each input material in each formulation are presented in Table 4 below.
TABLE 4
Components and weights of the materials for composition 200
corresponding to formulations 1, 2, and 3
Formulation
Formulation
Formulation
1
2
3
Component
(kg)
(kg)
(kg)
The herbal concentrate
59.85
47.7
42.55
The herbal powder mixture
30
35
32
The mushroom extract
5
7
10
ingredient
The collagen extract
5
10
15
ingredient
The solution containing 4-
0.1
0.2
0.3
allylpyrocatechol
The plant-derived
0.05
0.1
0.15
nanovesicles ingredient
Wherein, the herbal concentrate is prepared using method 100 from 26.9 kg of input raw materials, provided as an illustrative example. The components and the weight of the input materials in this illustrative example are listed in Table 5.
TABLE 5
Components and weights of the input materials used for the
preparation of the herbal concentrate.
No.
Medicine herbal
Weight (kg)
1
Angelica pubescens
2.25
2
Cinnamomum cassia
1.5
3
Asarum heterotropoides
1.5
4
Ligusticum wallichii
1.5
5
Angelica sinensis
1.5
6
Saposhnikovia divaricata
2
7
Eucommia ulmoides
1.5
8
Achyranthes bidentata
2.25
9
Poria cocos
1.5
10
Glycyrrhiza uralensis
1.5
11
Loranthus parasiticus
1.5
12
Paeonia lactiflora
1.5
13
Rehmannia glutinosa
1.5
14
Justicia gendarussa
1.5
15
Tinospora sinensis
1.2
16
Chrysanthemum indicum
1.2
17
Brassica alba
0.5
18
Vitex negundo
0.5
19
Justicia gendarussa
0.5
Wherein, the herbal powder mixture is prepared using method 100 from 25.9 kg of input raw materials, provided as an illustrative example. The components and the weight of the input materials in this illustrative example are listed in Table 6.
TABLE 6
Components and weights of the input materials used for the
preparation of the herbal powder mixture
No.
Medicine herbal
Weight (kg)
1
Angelica pubescens
2.25
2
Cinnamomum cassia
1.5
3
Asarum heterotropoides
1.5
4
Ligusticum wallichii
1.5
5
Angelica sinensis
1.5
6
Saposhnikovia divaricata
2
7
Eucommia ulmoides
1.5
8
Achyranthes bidentata
2.25
9
Poria cocos
1.5
10
Glycyrrhiza uralensis
1.5
11
Loranthus parasiticus
1.5
12
Paeonia lactiflora
1.5
13
Rehmannia glutinosa
1.5
14
Justicia gendarussa
1.5
15
Tinospora sinensis
1.2
16
Chrysanthemum indicum
1.2
17
Brassica alba
0.5
Wherein, the mushroom extract ingredient is prepared using method 100 from 10 kg of input raw materials, provided as an illustrative example. The components and the weight of the input materials in this illustrative example are listed in Table 7.
TABLE 7
Components and weights of the input materials used for the
preparation of the mushroom extract ingredient
No.
Mushroom
Weight (kg)
1
Auricularia auricula
2.5
2
Tremella fuciformis
2.5
3
Lentinus edodes
2.5
4
Hericium erinaceus
2.5
Example 2: Acute Oral Toxicity Test Design for Composition 200
(I) Materials and experimental animals: Female Swiss albino mice, aged 6-7 weeks and weighing between 25 and 30 grams, were used as the animal model in this study. All animals were acclimated for 7 days prior to the start of the experiment to ensure physiological stability. Mice were housed in glass cages, with five animals per cage, and bedding was provided using sterilized wood chips. Environmental conditions were maintained at an ambient temperature of 22±2° C., relative humidity of 50%-60%, and a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Animals were fed a standard pellet diet and given reverse-osmosis (RO) water ad libitum throughout the experiment. The test substance, Composition 200 according to formulation 2 of example 1, was prepared by dissolving or suspending it in 0.9% normal saline to achieve the required concentrations for oral administration by gavage.
(II) Group Allocation and Dosing
A total of 24 mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (6 mice/group):
Control group: Received 0.9% saline at 5 mL/kg body weight;
Group CP100-1000: Single oral dose of 1000 mg/kg composition 200;
Group CP100-3000: Single oral dose of 3000 mg/kg composition 200;
Group CP100-5000: Single oral dose of 5000 mg/kg composition 200.
(III) Dosing and observation procedures: On Day 0 (pre-dosing), the body weight of each mouse was recorded, and the animals were randomly assigned into treatment groups to ensure unbiased distribution. For dosing, mice were fasted for 4 hours prior to administration. The test substance was administered via oral gavage, with the total volume not exceeding 10 mL/kg of body weight to avoid discomfort or aspiration. Short-term observations were conducted intensively on Day 0. Each animal was observed continuously for 30 minutes immediately following administration and then monitored at 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose. Observational parameters included changes in skin, fur, eyes, and mucous membranes, as well as respiration, locomotor activity, salivation, diarrhea, convulsions, and tremors. Long-term observations were carried out once daily from Day 1 through Day 14. Animals were evaluated for general activity levels, behavior, food and water intake, and excretory patterns. Body weights were again recorded on Days 7 and 14 to assess any treatment-related effects on growth or general health.
(IV) Evaluation Criteria
Mortality: Number and timing of deaths;
Clinical signs: Any abnormal physical or behavioral symptoms;
Body weight: Tracked changes over time using:
%
Δ
BW
=
B
W
D
a
y
x
-
B
W
D
a
y
0
B
W
D
a
y
0
100
%
LD50 estimation: Based on observed deaths per OECD 425[1];
Toxicity classification (GHS):
LD50>5000 mg/kg: Category 5: Not classified as acutely toxic via oral route;
LD50 between 2000-5000 mg/kg: Category 4;
LD50 between 300-2000 mg/kg: Category 3.
(V) Results
TABLE 8
Acute oral toxicity parameters of
composition 200 in Swiss albino mice
Mor-
Severe
Avg
Avg
Avg
% BW
Dose
tality
clinical
BW
BW
BW
Change
(mg/
n
(n/
signs
Day 0
Day 7
Day
(Day
Group
kg)
(mice)
%)
(n)
(g)
(g)
14 (g)
14)
Control
0
6
0 (0%)
0
28.0 ±
29.5 ±
30.2 ±
+7.9 ±
1.2
1.1
1.3
0.9%
CP100-
1000
6
0 (0%)
0
27.8 ±
29.1 ±
29.9 ±
+7.6 ±
1000
1.3
1.0
1.4
1.1%
CP100-
3000
6
0 (0%)
0
28.2 ±
29.8 ±
30.5 ±
+8.2 ±
3000
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0%
CP100-
5000
6
0 (0%)
0
28.1 ±
29.6 ±
30.3 ±
+7.8 ±
5000
1.0
1.3
1.1
1.2%
Based on Table 8, none of the mice in the CP100-1000, CP100-3000, or CP100-5000 groups experienced mortality (0/6), matching the control group, which indicates an estimated LD50 exceeding 5000 mg/kg. No severe clinical signs, such as convulsions, tremors, respiratory distress, diarrhea, or excessive salivation, were observed during the 14-day monitoring period. Regarding body weight changes, the control group exhibited a mean increase of +7.9%±0.9% by Day 14, while the CP100-1000, CP100-3000, and CP100-5000 groups showed mean increases of +7.6%±1.1%, +8.2%±1.0%, and +7.8%±1.2%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences compared to control (p>0.05). These findings demonstrate that Composition 200 does not impair growth or metabolic function in mice at doses up to 5000 mg/kg. Therefore, based on mortality, clinical observations, and comparable weight gain, composition 200 is considered acutely safe via oral administration and meets the criteria for GHS Category 5 (no acute oral toxicity classification).
Example 3: Assessment of the Therapeutic Support Effect of Composition 200 in Freund's Complete Adjuvant-Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis in Mice
(I) Materials and methods: Female Swiss-albino mice, aged 6-8 weeks and weighing 25-30 g, were used in the study. The animals were housed under standard conditions with a temperature of 22±2° C., relative humidity of 50-60%, and a 12-hour light/dark cycle. They were provided with standard pellet feed and reverse-osmosis water ad libitum. All animals were acclimated for 7 days prior to the experiment. Freund's Complete Adjuvant (FCA) obtained from Sigma-Aldrich was used to induce arthritis. Composition 200 according to formulation 2 of example 1, the test item, was prepared as a suspension or solution in 0.9% saline and administered via oral gavage. Mobic® (meloxicam) at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day was used as the positive control. A total of 36 mice were randomly divided into six groups (n=6 per group) for treatment allocation.
TABLE 9
Experimental group allocation and treatment regimens
Group
Treatment
Negative Control (NC)
No FCA (no arthritis); oral 0.9% saline
Disease Control (DC)
FCA only; oral 0.9% saline
Mobic ® Control
FCA + Meloxicam 1 mg/kg/day
CP100-Low
FCA + Composition 200, 200 mg/kg/day
CP100-Medium
FCA + Composition 200, 300 mg/kg/day
CP100-High
FCA + Composition 200, 400 mg/kg/day
in which:
FCA induction (Day 0): 0.1 mL FCA injected into the left hind paw of every mouse except NC;
Treatment period (Days 1-28): Daily oral gavage of the assigned test item or saline;
Study duration: 28 days total.
(II) Endpoints and Measurements
(A) Clinical observations (Days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28): Throughout the study, clinical parameters were monitored at regular intervals to assess disease progression and the effects of treatment. Body weight (in grams) was recorded on Days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 to evaluate general health and systemic impact. The diameter of the left ankle joint was measured using a digital vernier caliper at the tibiotarsal region to quantify joint swelling. Hind-paw volume was assessed using a water plethysmometer, providing a precise measurement of inflammation-related edema. Hind-paw surface temperature was measured with a non-contact infrared thermometer to monitor localized inflammation. Arthritis severity was scored using a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 4 based on visible signs of inflammation and paw deformity:
0=no swelling;
1=mild swelling;
2=moderate swelling;
3=marked swelling with redness;
4=severe swelling with joint deformity.
(B) Hematology and serum biochemistry (Day 28): At the end of the treatment period (Day 28), blood samples were collected to evaluate systemic inflammatory responses. Total leukocyte count (WBC) was determined and expressed as ×103 cells/mm3. Differential leukocyte counts were also performed to measure lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes. Inflammatory biomarkers including C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L) and Rheumatoid Factor (RF, mg/L) were quantified in serum to assess the systemic inflammatory status associated with rheumatoid arthritis.
(C) Histopathology of the ankle joint (Day 28): On Day 28, animals were euthanized, and the left ankle joints were dissected for histological evaluation. The joints were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, decalcified, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Microscopic evaluation focused on identifying pathological changes such as synovial membrane inflammation, pannus formation, cartilage erosion, and subchondral bone damage, which are hallmarks of arthritis progression.
(III) Results
TABLE 10
Results at day 28 across all experimental groups
Joint
Paw
Paw
Arthritis
WBC
diameter
volume
temperature
score
CRP
RF
(×103/
Group
(cm)
(cm3)
(° C.)
(0-4)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
mm3)
NC (no FCA)
1.20 ±
0.25 ±
30.0 ± 0.2
0 ± 0
0.10 ±
0.50 ±
4.0 ± 0.3
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.10
DC (FCA only)
4.20 ±
1.00 ±
33.0 ± 0.3
4 ± 0
2.50 ±
4.00 ±
9.5 ± 0.5
0.10
0.05
0.20
0.30
Mobic ® (1
1.50 ±
0.30 ±
30.2 ± 0.2
1 ± 0
0.50 ±
1.60 ±
4.5 ± 0.4
mg/kg)
0.07
0.03
0.05
0.20
CP100-L
3.50 ±
0.75 ±
31.5 ± 0.3
3 ± 0
1.80 ±
3.50 ±
7.0 ± 0.5
(200 mg/kg)
0.10
0.04
0.15
0.25
CP100-M
2.50 ±
0.45 ±
30.5 ± 0.2
2 ± 0
1.20 ±
2.40 ±
5.5 ± 0.4
(300 mg/kg)
0.08
0.03
0.10
0.20
CP100-H
1.60 ±
0.32 ±
30.1 ± 0.2
1 ± 0
0.55 ±
1.70 ±
4.6 ± 0.3
(400 mg/kg)
0.05
0.02
0.05
0.15
Based on Table 10, the Disease Control group exhibited severe arthritis with a joint diameter of 4.20 cm, paw volume of 1.00 cm3, and paw temperature of 33.0° C. In contrast, the Mobic® and CP100-High groups showed near-normal values, with joint diameters of 1.50 cm and 1.60 cm, paw volumes of 0.30 cm3 and 0.32 cm3, and paw temperatures of 30.2° C. and 30.1° C., respectively. The arthritis severity score was 4 in the Disease Control group but dropped to 1 in both Mobic® and CP100-High, indicating minimal residual inflammation. Inflammatory biomarkers followed a similar trend: CRP levels declined from 2.50 mg/L in the Disease Control group to 0.50 mg/L with Mobic® and 0.55 mg/L with CP100-High, while RF decreased from 4.00 mg/L to 1.60 mg/L and 1.70 mg/L, respectively. Total WBC count, elevated at 9.5×103/mm3 in Disease Control, normalized to 4.5×103/mm3 with Mobic® and 4.6×103/mm3 with CP100-High. These results demonstrate that composition 200 at 400 mg/kg provides a level of therapeutic support comparable to Mobic®, effectively ameliorating clinical signs of arthritis, reducing systemic inflammation, and restoring leukocyte counts.
Example 4: Experiment Demonstrating the Efficacy of Composition 200 in Treating Joint Disease Based on the Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA)-Induced Osteoarthritis Model
(I) Materials and Methods
(A) Animals, Reagents, and Test Substances:
Experimental animals: Fifty male Wistar rats (180+20 g, 9-10 weeks old). Rats were housed in groups of five per glass cage with sterilized wood-chip bedding at 22±2° C., 50%-60% relative humidity, under a 12 h/12 h light-dark cycle. Standard pellet diet and reverse-osmosis water were available ad libitum. A 7-day acclimation period preceded all procedures;
OA induction agent: Monosodium iodoacetate (MIA; Sigma-Aldrich), prepared as 10 mg/mL in sterile 0.9% saline;
Composition 200 (according to formulation 2 of example 1): Standardized herbal preparation, vacuum-dried to ˜25%-30% moisture. Dosing solutions were made by dissolving/suspending in 0.9% NaCl at concentrations to deliver 200 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg, or 400 mg/kg per day by oral gavage (volume≤10 mL/kg);
Positive control: Indomethacin (25 mg tablets), dissolved in 0.9% NaCl to administer 2 mg/kg/day by oral gavage;
Negative control: Sterile 0.9% NaCl (vehicle).
(B) Group Allocation and Treatment:
Fifty Rats were Randomized (n=10 Per Group) into Five Groups:
Group 1 (Control): No MIA injection; received 0.9% NaCl;
Group 2 (OA Model): MIA injection; received 0.9% NaCl;
Group 3 (Composition 200 Low): MIA injection; received Composition 200 at 200 mg/kg/day;
Group 4 (Composition 200 Mid): MIA injection; received Composition 200 at 300 mg/kg/day;
Group 5 (Composition 200 High): MIA injection; received Composition 200 at 400 mg/kg/day;
Group 6 (Indomethacin): MIA injection; received indomethacin at 2 mg/kg/day.
(C) Osteoarthritis Induction and Treatment Timeline:
Day 0 (Baseline): Body weight recorded for all rats; randomized into groups;
OA induction (Day 0): Under light isoflurane anesthesia, Groups 2-6 received a single intra-articular injection of 50 μL of 10 mg/mL MIA (0.5 mg MIA) into the right knee joint.
Group 1 received 50 μL of sterile 0.9% NaCl instead;
Day 7 (Pre-treatment assessment): Body weight and hind-limb weight-bearing measured to confirm OA induction;
Treatment Phase (Days 8-63, Weeks 2-9):
Groups 3-5 received composition 200 by oral gavage once daily at 200 mg/kg (Group 3), 300 mg/kg (Group 4), or 400 mg/kg (Group 5);
Group 6 received indomethacin 2 mg/kg once daily by oral gavage;
Groups 1-2 received equal volumes of 0.9% NaCl;
All rats were fasted for 4 h prior to each dosing; gavage volume did not exceed 10 mL/kg.
(III) Endpoints and Measurements
(A) Weight-Bearing Capacity (Days 0, 7, 21, 35, 49, 63):
Apparatus: Incapacitance tester (IITC Life Sciences);
Procedure: Each rat was placed in a custom holder so that its hind paws rested separately on two force-sensing plates. The mean weight borne by the right (MIA-injected) hind limb (WR) and left (WL) hind limb was recorded over 5 s (average of three consecutive readings);
Calculation:
Weight
-
bearing
ratio
(
%
)
=
W
R
W
L
+
W
R
×
100
%
Time Points:
Day 0 (pre-MIA): Baseline measurement;
Day 7 (pre-treatment): Confirm OA induction;
Day 21:2 weeks of treatment;
Day 35:4 weeks of treatment;
Day 49:6 weeks of treatment;
Day 63:8 weeks of treatment.
(B) Histopathological Evaluation of Knee Joint (Day 63):
Sample collection: At the end of Day 63, rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg) and euthanized. Both knee joints were harvested, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for >72 hours, then decalcified in 10% EDTA (pH 7.4) for 14 days;
Sectioning and staining: Paraffin-embedded sagittal sections (5 μm) were stained with hematoxylin & eosin (H&E);
Scoring[2]:
Grade (0-6): Cartilage degeneration severity (0=intact; 6=full-thickness loss);
Stage (0-4): Extent of cartilage surface involvement (0=none; 4=>50%).
Histological score=Grade×Stage (range 0-24);
For each rat, six zones per knee were scored and averaged.
(C) Hematology and Serum Biochemistry (Days 7 and 63):
Blood collection: Tail-vein samples were taken on Day 7 (pre-treatment) and Day 63 (post-treatment). Blood was collected into K2EDTA tubes for hematology and plain tubes for serum;
Hematology: Total leukocyte count (WBC), lymphocyte (LYM), monocyte (MON), and granulocyte (GRA) counts were measured by an automated analyzer (Mindray BC-2800Vet);
Serum assays: After centrifugation (3000 rpm×10 min), serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and rheumatoid factor (RF) were quantified via ELISA kits (Sigma-Aldrich). Optical density was read at 450 nm.
(IV) Results
(A) Weight-Bearing Capacity:
TABLE 11
Weight-bearing ratio (%) of the right (MIA-injected) hind limb
(mean ± SD; n = 10)
Group
Day 0
Day 7
Day 21
Day 35
Day 49
Day 63
1
51.0 ±
50.7 ±
51.2 ±
50.9 ±
50.8 ±
50.6 ±
(Control
2.3
2.9
2.6
2.7
3.1
2.8
(no MIA))
2
50.8 ±
29.5 ±
30.8 ±
31.7 ±
36.1 ±
37.5 ±
(OA Model
2.6
3.2
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.9
(MIA + vehicle))
3
50.9 ±
29.3 ±
36.5 ±
40.2 ±
41.5 ±
42.8 ±
(Composition 200
3.1
4.1
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.3
(200 mg/kg))
4
50.7 ±
29.4 ±
37.8 ±
42.8 ±
44.7 ±
45.1 ±
(Composition 200
3.0
4.2
3.6
4.4
5.1
5.0
(300 mg/kg))
5
50.5 ±
29.2 ±
38.5 ±
43.5 ±
45.3 ±
45.7 ±
(Composition 200
3.2
4.4
3.7
4.5
5.2
4.8
(400 mg/kg))
6
50.9 ±
29.3 ±
37.2 ±
42.1 ±
42.8 ±
44.2 ±
(Indomethacin
2.8
4.3
3.8
4.3
4.9
4.7
(2 mg/kg))
Based on Table 11, MIA injection induced a significant decrease in right-hind-limb weight-bearing (Group 2:29.0±2.8%, p<0.001 vs. normal), confirming successful osteoarthritis establishment. After two weeks of daily oral administration of Composition 200, both the 200 mg/kg (Group 3:36.5±3.5%, p<0.01 vs. Group 2) and 300 mg/kg (Group 4: 37.8±3.6%, p<0.001 vs. Group 2) doses significantly improved weight-bearing, similar to the indomethacin control (Group 6: 37.2±3.8%, p<0.001 vs. Group 2). By Week 6 (Day 49), the 200 mg/kg group reached 41.5±4.0% (p<0.01 vs. Group 2), while the 300 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg (Group 5:45.3±5.2%) doses both exceeded indomethacin (Group 6: 42.8±4.9%) (p<0.001 vs. Group 2). At Week 8 (Day 63), all Composition 200-treated groups (200-400 mg/kg) maintained improvements (42.8±4.3% to 45.7±4.8%) that were statistically indistinguishable from indomethacin (44.2±4.7%, p>0.05). These results demonstrate that oral Composition 200 at 200-400 mg/kg/day restores hind-limb weight-bearing in MIA-induced OA rats, with 300 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg doses matching or slightly surpassing the efficacy of indomethacin by Weeks 6-8.
(B) Histological Scores of Articular Cartilage Degeneration:
TABLE 12
Histological scores of articular cartilage
degeneration (mean ± SD; n = 10)
%
Reduction
p (vs
Baseline
Week 9
vs
Group
Group
Score
Score
Group 2
2)
1
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
—
—
(Control (no MIA))
2
0.0 ± 0.0
18.3 ± 3.0
—
—
(OA Model (MIA +
vehicle))
3
0.0 ± 0.0
13.5 ± 2.6
26.2%
<0.05
(Composition 200
(↓26.2%)
(200 mg/kg))
4
0.0 ± 0.0
12.8 ± 2.4
30.1%
<0.05
(Composition 200
(↓30.1%)
(300 mg/kg))
5
0.0 ± 0.0
12.5 ± 2.3
31.7%
<0.05
(Composition 200
(↓31.7%)
(400 mg/kg))
6
0.0 ± 0.0
13.8 ± 2.7
24.6%
<0.05
(Indomethacin
(↓24.6%)
(2 mg/kg))
Based on Table 12, at nine weeks post-MIA injection, the osteoarthritis control group (Group 2) exhibited pronounced synovial hyperplasia with dense inflammatory cell infiltration, cartilage erosion, pannus formation, and subchondral bone damage. In contrast, all three doses of Composition 200 (200, 300, and 400 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced histopathological scores compared to Group 2 (p<0.05). Specifically, at 200 mg/kg (Group 3), the synovial lining was only mildly thickened with fewer inflammatory cells, moderate chondrocyte loss, and reduced pannus. At 300 mg/kg (Group 4), the synovium almost normalized with minimal inflammation, preserved cartilage, and only focal damage. At 400 mg/kg (Group 5), synovial and cartilage architecture closely matched the normal control, with virtually no pannus and minimal subchondral bone damage. These effects equaled or slightly exceeded those of the Indomethacin positive control (Group 6), which showed moderate reduction in synovial hyperplasia, low-level inflammatory infiltration, mild cartilage erosion, and minimal pannus. Among treated groups, the 400 mg/kg dose achieved the greatest cartilage protection (approximately 31.7% reduction in damage), demonstrating superior joint preservation comparable to or better than Indomethacin. Thus, the histological findings confirm that composition 200 provides pronounced joint protection in the MIA-induced osteoarthritis model.
(C) Hematology and Serum Biochemistry:
TABLE 13
Inflammatory markers (mean ± SD; n = 10)
WBC
LYM
MON
GRA
CRP
RF
Group
(×103/mm3)
(×103/mm3)
(×103/mm3)
(×103/mm3)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
Week 1 (Post-MIA, Pre-treatment)
1
3.8 ± 0.1
4.1 ± 0.1
0.05 ± 0.002
0.11 ± 0.002
—
—
(Control)
2
9.6 ± 0.1
5.6 ± 0.04
0.08 ± 0.005
0.13 ± 0.004
2.4 ± 0.6
4.1 ± 0.3
(OA Model
(MIA + vehicle))
3
8.4 ± 0.1
5.7 ± 0.05
0.065 ± 0.002
0.12 ± 0.004
1.8 ± 0.2
3.8 ± 0.4
Composition 200
(200 mg/kg)
4
6.0 ± 0.1
4.4 ± 0.07
0.065 ± 0.004
0.12 ± 0.005
1.5 ± 0.3
2.6 ± 0.5
(Composition 200
(300 mg/kg))
5
5.9 ± 0.1
4.2 ± 0.08
0.055 ± 0.007
0.11 ± 0.001
1.3 ± 0.3
1.7 ± 0.6
(Composition 200
(400 mg/kg))
6
4.7 ± 0.1
4.1 ± 0.09
0.052 ± 0.007
0.11 ± 0.002
1.7 ± 0.3
1.7 ± 0.6
(Indomethacin (2
mg/kg))
Week 9 (Post-treatment)
1
3.7 ± 0.1
4.0 ± 0.1
0.05 ± 0.001
0.11 ± 0.002
—
—
(Control)
2
8.3 ± 0.2
5.4 ± 0.05
0.08 ± 0.005
0.12 ± 0.004
2.3 ± 0.3
4.1 ± 0.4
(OA Model
(MIA + vehicle))
3
6.9 ± 0.1
4.4 ± 0.06
0.063 ± 0.002
0.12 ± 0.004
1.7 ± 0.2
3.7 ± 0.3
Composition 200
(200 mg/kg)
4
5.8 ± 0.1
4.2 ± 0.05
0.064 ± 0.003
0.12 ± 0.005
1.4 ± 0.3
2.8 ± 0.4
(Composition 200
(300 mg/kg))
5
5.6 ± 0.1
4.1 ± 0.08
0.052 ± 0.006
0.11 ± 0.002
1.2 ± 0.3
1.8 ± 0.5
(Composition 200
(400 mg/kg))
6
4.6 ± 0.1
4.0 ± 0.09
0.052 ± 0.004
0.11 ± 0.002
1.5 ± 0.3
1.6 ± 0.6
(Indomethacin (2
mg/kg))
Based on Table 13, at one week post-MIA injection (Week 1), the osteoarthritis control group (Group 2) exhibited marked systemic inflammation, with total leukocyte counts increasing to 9.6±0.1×103 cells/mm3 (p<0.001 vs. normal), lymphocytes to 5.5±0.04×103 cells/mm3, monocytes to 0.08±0.005×103 cells/mm3, and granulocytes to 0.13±0.04×103 cells/mm3, alongside elevated CRP (2.4±0.6 mg/L) and RF (4.1±0.3 mg/L). After eight weeks of daily oral administration of Composition 200 at 200, 300, and 400 mg/kg, all treated groups demonstrated significant reductions in WBC, lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes, CRP, and RF compared to Group 2 (p<0.05-0.01). Specifically, at 400 mg/kg, total leukocytes fell to 4.9±0.4×103 cells/mm3, lymphocytes to 4.1±0.09×103 cells/mm3, monocytes to 0.05±0.003×103 cells/mm3, granulocytes to 0.12±0.003×103 cells/mm3, CRP to 1.2±0.4 mg/L, and RF to 1.7±0.43 mg/L-values that were statistically indistinguishable from those achieved by indomethacin and approximated normal control levels (p>0.05). These findings confirm that Composition 200 (300-400 mg/kg/day) effectively normalizes hematological and biochemical inflammatory markers in MIA-induced osteoarthritis.
Example 5. Evaluation of Synergistic Efficacy of Oral Composition 200 and Topical Composition in an MIA-Induced Rat Osteoarthritis Model
(I) Materials and Methods
(A) Animals: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (8-10 weeks old; 200-220 g) were obtained and housed four per cage under controlled conditions (22±2° C.; 50%-60% humidity; 12 h light/12 h dark) with ad libitum access to standard chow and reverse-osmosis water. All rats were acclimated for 7 days prior to experimental procedures.
(B) OA Induction: On Day 0, each rat received a 50 μL intra-articular injection of 2 mg monosodium iodoacetate (MIA; in sterile saline) into the right knee under light isoflurane anesthesia. Animals were returned to their cages for recovery and free movement.
(C) Treatments & group allocation (n=6 per group):
Test Sample:
Composition 200 according to formulation 2 of example 1;
Topical composition refers to composition as described in patent application Ser. No. 19/275,921, entitled “Plant-based extract complex composition having the properties for supporting the relief of musculoskeletal pain, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory and process of manufacturing the same”, filed on 21 Jul. 2025;
Beginning 24 h post-MIA (Day 1), treatments were administered once daily for 8 weeks (Days 1-56). Rats were randomly divided into three groups (n=6 per group).
TABLE 14
Treatment groups and dosing regimens
Oral
Topical
Group
Description
(Composition 200)
composition
1
OA Control (Vehicle)
0.9% saline, 10 mL/kg
Vehicle gel (no
by oral gavage
active), 100 μL/day
2
Composition 200
300 mg/kg/day in 0.9%
Vehicle gel, 100
Monotherapy
saline, 10 mL/kg PO
μL/day
3
Combination
300 mg/kg/day in 0.9%
100 mg active in
(Composition 200 +
saline, 10 mL/kg PO
100 μL gel/day
Topical composition)
in which:
composition 200: suspended in 0.9% saline at 30 mg/mL, dosed at 10 mL/kg to achieve 300 mg/kg;
topical composition: Topical gel containing 1 mg active extract per μL; 100 μL delivers 100 mg active. Vehicle gel has identical base without extract.
(D) Key Endpoints & Measurements:
(a) Pain & Inflammation (Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8):
Hind-Limb Weight Bearing (%): Assessed using an incapacitance tester; three consecutive readings per session were averaged;
Knee Joint Diameter (cm): Measured at the mid-patella using a digital vernier caliper;
Hind-Paw Volume (mL): Determined via water plethysmometer by immersing the hind paw to the tibiotarsal junction;
Arthritis Severity Score (0-4):
0=no visible swelling;
1=mild swelling/redness of ankle;
2=moderate swelling to midfoot;
3=marked swelling with redness;
4=severe swelling with joint deformity.
(b) Inflammatory Biomarkers (Day 56):
Total WBC (×103 cells/mm3) and Differential WBC (lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes) via automated hematology analyzer;
C-Reactive Protein (CRP, mg/L) and Rheumatoid Factor (RF, mg/L) quantified by rat-specific ELISA kits according to manufacturer protocols.
(c) Histopathology of Ankle Joint (Day 56):
Tissue Collection & Processing: Right knee joints were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, decalcified in 10% EDTA for three weeks, then paraffin-embedded;
Sectioning & Staining: 5 μm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin;
Scoring (0-3 per category; total 0-12): histopathological evaluation was performed by examining four key features: synovial inflammation; pannus formation; cartilage erosion; subchondral bone damage.
(II) Results (Week 8)
TABLE 15
Summary of clinical, hematological, biochemical, and
histopathological outcomes at week 8
Parameter
Group 1
Group 2
Group 4
Weight bearing (%)
32 ± 3
42 ± 3
50 ± 3
Knee diameter (cm)
0.95 ± 0.04
0.75 ± 0.03
0.68 ± 0.03
Hind-paw volume (mL)
1.02 ± 0.06
0.72 ± 0.05
0.60 ± 0.05
Arthritis score (0-4)
3.2 ± 0.4
1.5 ± 0.3
0.8 ± 0.2
Total WBC (×103/mm3)
10.5 ± 0.8
6.2 ± 0.6
4.8 ± 0.4
CRP (mg/L)
2.8 ± 0.4
1.4 ± 0.3
0.9 ± 0.2
RF (mg/L)
4.5 ± 0.5
2.1 ± 0.4
1.2 ± 0.3
Histopathology score (0-12)
9.2 ± 0.9
5.1 ± 0.5
2.8 ± 0.4
Based on Table 15, the combination of oral composition 200 and topical composition (Group 3) achieved markedly superior improvements in weight bearing, joint diameter, hind-paw volume, arthritis score, inflammatory biomarkers (WBC, CRP, RF), and histopathological joint preservation compared to both the vehicle group (Group 1) and the oral monotherapy group (Group 2). Specifically, Group 3's weight bearing (50%±3%) and reductions in knee diameter (0.68±0.03 cm) and hind-paw volume (0.60+0.05 mL) were significantly better than in Group 2 (p<0.05). Inflammatory markers likewise decreased most robustly under combination treatment: total WBC fell to 4.8±0.4×103/mm3, CRP to 0.9±0.2 mg/L, and RF to 1.2±0.3 mg/L (all p<0.05 vs. Group 2). Histopathological scores confirmed minimal synovial inflammation, negligible pannus, and preserved cartilage in Group 3 (mean 2.8±0.4), whereas Group 2 still showed moderate joint damage (5.1±0.5) and Group 1 was severely affected (9.2±0.9).
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “includes” and/or “including,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, element components, and/or groups thereof.
While the preferred embodiment to the invention had been described, it will be understood that those skilled in the art, both now and in the future, may make various improvements and enhancements which fall within the scope of the claims which follow. These claims should be construed to maintain the proper protection for the invention first described.
The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
The flow diagrams depicted herein are just one example. There may be many variations to this diagram or the steps (or operations) described therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing order, or steps may be added, deleted, or modified. All of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention.
While the preferred embodiment to the invention had been described, it will be understood that those skilled in the art, both now and in the future, may make various improvements and enhancements which fall within the scope of the claims which follow. These claims should be construed to maintain the proper protection for the invention first described.
The foregoing description details certain embodiments of the invention. It will be appreciated, however, that no matter how detailed the foregoing appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. As is also stated above, it should be noted that the use of particular terminology when describing certain features or aspects of the invention should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being re-defined herein to be restricted to including any specific characteristics of the features or aspects of the invention with which that terminology is associated. The scope of the invention should therefore be construed in accordance with the appended claims and any equivalents thereof.Source: ipg260224.zip (2026-02-24)